i
i
i
 i
i
i
i i i
i i
i

i
Organoleptic character
  • Visual aspect
  • Nose: Intensity
  • Nose: Quality
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Intensity
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Quality
  • General impression, harmony
Scale of evaluation of at least 5 columns os provided for each organoleptic character
  • Excellent (0 point of penalty)
  • Very Good (1 point of penalty)
  • Good (2 points of penalty)
  • Inadequate (4 points of penalty)
  • Eliminated (Eliminated))
Transcription and calculation of the results
Still Wines
Sparkling Wines
Visual Aspect
-
x 1
Foam - x 2
Limpidity x 1 -
Noze Intensity x 1 x 1
Quality x 2 x 2
Taste Effervescence - x 2
Intensity x 2 x 2
Quality x 3 x 3
Harmony x 3 x 3
  • Each sample receives a rating which is the median rating based on the ratings resulting from the calculation of the evaluation of each of the jurors.
  • When there is an odd number of jurors, the median is immediately evident. If the number happens to be even, the median is based on the average of the closest two ratings in the middle of the ratings.
Conferring the Awards
Awards
Still Wines
Sparkling Wines
Gold Medal of Excellence
0 - 3
0 - 5
Gold Medal
4 - 8
6 - 13
Silver Medal
9 - 14
14 - 21
Bronze Medal
15 - 21
22 - 30
  • The sum of all medals must not exceed 1/3 of participating wines.
  • The samples that obtained the least good results are eliminated.
ii